🔗 Share this article

Iturns out the manager was able to withstand a loss to Grimsby. Survive losing a crucial European final against one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, squandering some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. But there was a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to engage. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. Even the most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated his squad for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the intense pressure and animal charisma of a England's top division's most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this entire painful saga seems to paint the director in a whole new light. It may have been easy, based on his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to view him as merely a functionary within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position as much to his friendship with his former boss Omar Berrada rather than any demonstrable skill. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which the club's competitors will now be justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Conflict Over Formation and Ideology

For example, it was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, played a key role in trying to persuade him to abandon his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. However, these judgements hold greater authority when issued from the mouth of a man the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, holder of three England caps and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is departing with a full payout, without any penalty clause in place. The director seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – men like him – function on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not quite equivalent to being ready to receive.

The Ultimate Authority Behind the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to embrace data science and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he declared that the team's approach of play “will be determined in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical football matters, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Who else could one trust to oversee an enlightened programme of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Football Order: Executives Over Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to go into an organization and implement their plan through to completion. Yet how many businesses have such individuals set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the tactics by the directors and hire a coach who can tailor their methods accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the product, yet finally accountable should it be delivered poorly or fails of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged whereas the people who hired him continue to make errors another day.

The Modern Corporate Football: Accountability for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents neoliberalism in action: the rise of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Hire the system coach only to fire him for using too much 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and later discard them for taking too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.