Families' Distress Over Coastal Erosion Endangering Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.
A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards
Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”
Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.
Haunted by the Past
A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.
“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”
“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”
A Soldier's Grave in Peril
Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.
“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”
She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”
Searching for Solutions and Certainty
The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.
Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.
“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”
A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”
It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”
The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.